Skip to content
← Back to work

Legal review with citation-level evaluation

Verifiable tasks across contracts, regulations and case material—not unsupported conclusions.

≈1.3Klong-doc tasks3review layers>96%citation agreement
MERIDIAN / WORKSPACE
Legal review with citation-level evaluation · workbench concept
Meridian workspace example

Task understanding before scale

A legal-intelligence program needed to evaluate conflict detection and memo drafting across a master agreement, schedules, regulatory material and revision history. Legal specialists fixed jurisdiction, time and controlling-text versions before clause extraction, conflict analysis, research QA and citation checks. Material disagreement entered blind review and adjudication. This is a sanitized representative delivery structure and does not constitute legal advice.

01

Contracts, schedules, regulation and revision history reviewed together

02

Every material claim tied to a text version and citation span

03

Jurisdiction, rationale and ruling retained for disputes

02 / PROCUREMENT REVIEW STRUCTURE

One structure aligns the questions asked by model, data, procurement and security teams.

01 / Capability gap

Verifiable tasks across contracts, regulations and case material—not unsupported conclusions.

02 / Evaluation object

Legal packs spanning agreements, amendments, regulation and revision history

03 / Task design

Jurisdiction scoping, clause extraction, conflict clustering, citation QA and independent legal review

04 / Operating scale

Representative batch of approximately 1,300 long-document tasks with three review layers

05 / QA protocol

Jurisdiction scope × citation evidence × blind adjudication; Jurisdiction, rationale and ruling retained for disputes

06 / Evidence package

Contracts, schedules, regulation and revision history reviewed together; Every material claim tied to a text version and citation span; Citation agreement above 96% for material claims; version conflicts remained traceable

07 / Disclosure

Client identity, original material and selected volumes are removed or banded. This brief explains delivery method and does not guarantee future results.

NEXT STEP

Review samples. Then define the task.

Carry this direction into your enquiry to confirm delivery, verification and sample scope.

Request samplesInspect deliverables

Build data around your next capability goal

Start with a task goal and a sample. Define the materials, specialists, verification methods and delivery scope together.